|
Chris leben tattoo, changeling tattoo, chris conn tattoo,
cheap tattoo removal, chainwheel tattoo
|
 |
chris leben tattoo -> chris garver tattoo artist |
 Posted: 10 17 2009 Post subject: chainwheel tattoo |
 |
|
| Sponsored by Overture Films |
| chroma tattoo phoenix az :: chandler tattoo |
| Author |
Message |
Ishmael
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 16 2009 Post subject: cheryl cole s tattoo |
|
|
Probably to protect their hands.
I worked with a 300 lbs woman. Everyday she would bring in McDonalds big breakfast & sweet-tea, and always went out for lunch. She wheezed and panted after only walking across the building. She constantly told us she would begin working out and eating healthy, but never did.She disturbed me so much I've lost 40 lbs.. She continues to gain weight and her dad just had a heart attack. If this doesn't make her change her ways, I don't see her living very long.It's all about discipline and making time, not excuses.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Doriya
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 15 2009 Post subject: chris leben tattoo |
|
|
|
“The guy is just trying to be a douche, and it's working.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Cadesha
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 14 2009 Post subject: Online casinos free play |
|
|
Issac Asimov would have happily reminded you that coincidences (seemingly associated but otherwise unassociated events) happen all the time..
This is like a underpunishment!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
JASHAR
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 12 2009 Post subject: chris leben tattoo |
|
|
Ya, sorry about Nickelback....?
OOoooooh.. Might be time to dump the iPhone.Maybe if Apple gave the simple ablity for a home screen (Intelliscreen by Rock) or a way to categorize your apps (Categories on Cydia). These 2 apps alone make the argument for Jailbreaking.No Jailbreak along with way overpriced service from ATT.Come on Apple quit acting like Sony. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Lizeka
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 11 2009 Post subject: ckc tattoo |
|
|
This is a sign of the policy driven, government as a business world we live in now. Industry is supposed to meet the demands of consumers not dictate them. I our only hope is to ride this sort of thing out until the current politicians grow old and die and a younger more relevant generation takes office. How can an international band of whiny politicians and lobbyist's enforce something like this on the public and the ISP's? Can someone explain the ACTA's actual authority?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Wanda
Guest
|
| Posted: 10 10 2009 Post subject: chula tattoo |
|
|
|
Isn't it? I'm at work. What else could that possibly be?
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Jesusa
Guest
|
| Posted: 09 12 2009 Post subject: cherry vine tattoo |
|
|
|
If you want more Roger Rabbit, just watch the DVD's special features. It has 4 more Roger Rabbit cartoons that played in theaters before Disney's live-action movies, such as Honey We Blew Up the Kid and Freaky Friday.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Qwyneshea
Guest
|
| Posted: 09 09 2009 Post subject: chris leben tattoo |
|
|
|
!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Kandey
Guest
|
@drunkCatholic - Actually I do "get" the public option as I have been following this debate very closely.@TimtheTaxMan - General fund money may be used to set up the public option initially, but that's covered in the cost of the bill. After that it's funded entirely by premiums. Since the CBO has projected that the bills currently going through congress end up reducing the deficit over 10 years, the cost of the bill (and thus the initial taxpayer money used to set up any public option) will be recouped with the savings.@darkened - um, no? You're describing a medicare-like system. In such a system as you describe it (ie, similar to public schools), it would be free for anybody to go to the doctor, and the government would pay the doctor with money collected through taxes. That's what happens with kids and teachers, that's what they have in Canada for doctors, and what we have for people over 65. US Seniors on Medicare are free to use their own money to pay for procedures not covered by Medicare, which would be analogous to choosing a private school in your description. I personally would be fine with such a system, however THIS DOES NOT DESCRIBE THE PUBLIC OPTION in the bills currently moving through congress. The Public Option is a non-profit insurance option paid for by premiums, not taxes. You still have to pay for it just like you do private insurance.@scamper22 - Tax money will be used to pay for the public option indirectly, however this is money that is also available to private insurers. This may sound like I'm backtracking on what I said earlier, but I'm not. The government isn't saying "Here's Tax money, public option, because you're run by the government". The tax money I'm talking about is Medicaid. So the government is saying "Hey poor people, here's some tax credits you can use to purchase insurance with. Go pick whatever insurance you want with it, you can choose the Public Option if you want to"- basically it's tax money to help poor people pay their premiums. So if the Medicaid recipients choose private insurance, the private insurers get that money. If they choose the public option, it goes back to the government. Without a public option 100% of that tax money goes to private insurers. Now, the health reform bills currently moving through congress make these credits available to more people, however that has nothing at all to do with the public option.@jpop - I'm not familiar with Hawaii's system, however that is an impossible scenario for the public option as currently under discussion. It WOULD be a possible result if the public option were paid for with a set amount of the budget every year (as it sounds like Hawaii's was), but as I've already covered it's paid for by premiums paid by people that choose it, not by the government. So the more people that choose it, the more money it has. So how can it run out of money? It actually works better the more people that join it, because not everybody requires medical attention all the time, therefore some people are paying premiums and not getting sick. Because the public option would be non-profit, 100% of money taken in by premiums and not given out to pay doctors would then go to reducing the premiums you have to pay. That's the whole idea of making it run by the federal government instead of co-ops or run by states, etc. - the more people the better it performs. That's also the reason that I believe that limiting the public option availability to those unable to get private insurance - which is what is currently proposed - is a mistake. Senator Ron Wyden agrees, and is also a proponent of letting anybody into the public option if they want it.Please, keep 'em coming. I like correcting people's misconceptions. |
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
| 9 User(s) are reading this topic (8 Guests and 40 Anonymous Users) |
|
 |
|
| |
All times are GMT - 3 Hours
|
| Page 1 of 1 |
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in